Sometimes you wonder what’s going on.

Having ranted two weeks ago about Stewards and incompetence, perhaps I should not be completely surprised by this evening’s news… and yet…

I think that most multi-cellular organisms understand that sports teams are – and here I generalise, naturally, so bring me not your ‘Shoeless Joe’ stories – quite keen on winning.

There do seem to be obvious exceptions; the England football and cricket teams (frequently) and Toyota (how else do you explain their signings over the last decade?) but, by and large, sports teams compete to try and win.

In most sports, this is a given. It is understood that an athlete/competitor or a group of athletes/competitors will try as hard as they can to beat their rivals. In horse racing, for instance, this is not just understood but demanded; riders will be punished severely for ‘not trying’.

Many sporting rules are put in place by the authorities that govern them to try and rein in the more excessive elements of competition, to ensure safety, fair play, survivability and so on.

Not many professional sports teams go for a Sunday morning kick-about. They tend not to be doing it just to get some fresh air or work off last night’s Bhuna. The element of competition is pretty fundamental to them. They like it. Indeed, they’ll tell you, they NEED it.

Why, if not, would we have just witnessed more than a hundred men spend three weeks riding bicycles, surviving – nay, thriving under – the sort of conditions that would cause a righteous media outcry if they were inflicted on civilians? To win a race, that’s why.

Why, if not, would teams be spending the criminally obscene amounts they spend just to put two cars on a track 20 times a year? To win a race.

Given all of the above then, explain to me in words of one syllable, please – because I am having a problem understanding this one – why anyone, never mind anyone purportedly involved in the sport in any way whatsoever, would imagine that the Renault team would have “knowingly released car no. 7 from the pitstop position without one of the retaining devices for the wheel-nuts being securely in position, this being an indication that the wheel itself may not have been properly secured.”

And having done that, why would the team have “being aware of this, failed to take any action to prevent the car from leaving the pitlane….failed to inform the driver of this problem or to advise him to take appropriate action given the circumstances, even though the driver contacted the team by radio believing he had a puncture.”

Obviously, only if they were either certifiably insane, criminally reckless and negligent, totally uncaring or not at the track at all. Because NO team would, with certainty and deliberation, risk a good race finish (we should remember that Fernando Alonso, the driver of car 7, was at this stage in the lead of the race) by purposefully sending its car out with a loose wheel. No team would put a valued (to the rate of several million dollars a year’s worth of salary) employee at risk to his health, nor is it realistic to imagine that – even at Renault, a nominally ‘French’ team – having discovered that the wheel was loose, they just shrugged their shoulders and said, ‘oh, well…’

Yet, that is exactly what the Stewards at the Hungarian Grand Prix are suggesting, as they ban Renault from the next race.

To ensure that Renault will appeal, they have come down with the most incredibly stupid decision imaginable; penalising human error by robbing the team’s former World Champion driver of the chance to race at home, in Valencia.

To suggest that is was anything other than pure human error that Fernando’s wheel was not properly attached is palpable insanity.

To suggest that the team, being aware of the problem, did nothing at all about it, is also madness.

To penalise such utterly dedicated professionals as Formula 1 teams for human error is certifiable.

What next? Drivers banned for driving too fast and crashing? Teams banned for using the wrong tyre/fuel strategy and not winning races?

Perhaps Stewards ought to be subject to Article 3.2 of the Sporting Regulations, and banned for rank stupidity.

Or is this just another element in Max’s grand plan? To force another stand-off with FOTA? Because, if Renault’s appeal is turned down and the ban stands, surely no team, FOTA or otherwise, can afford to race in Valencia. Not if the consequence of human error is to be banned from racing.

Surely this can’t get any worse?



Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “Insanity

  1. Victor

    Wow, wow, wow, slow down there, mate… we still need someone to commentate on whatever there is to commentate.

    It’s a matter of overreacting to the very unfortunate incidents which took place in the space of one week. And it’s also the FIA putting its boot in, some might say as retaliation against the FOTA teams and a last cry of “I’m here and you don’t mess around with ME”.

    Please remind me when was the last time someone was sent out with a loose wheel, a wheel which eventually fell off, and was penalised for it in this manner. Yes, never, until now. Spain 2007 was the last time it happened, to Nick Heidfeld’s BMW, and I didn’t see BMW banned from the next race, even though they commited the same error on the very same wheel, basically sending the car out with an unfastened right-front. To add more comedy to the situation, the wheelnut fell off in the pitlane and a Toyota mechanic was standing around holding that wheelnut and probably asking what went wrong and to whom it belonged.

    It’s over-reaction. The FIA want people to see them yet again as the “good guys”, who want safety first in the sport, but they’ve blown it yet again. If they ban Renault for something that COULD have injured someone (emphasis on “could”, as in “actually didn’t”), they should ban Brawn as well because something that fell off their car actually injured another driver. Oh well, since Flavio is a leading figure in FOTA, Max thought he should spank him as hard as possible while making people think he does something else.

    Multiple standards, if ever I saw any.

  2. rubbergoat

    Very well said sir!

    I think Renault getting banned was either (a) a typical knee-jerk reaction from the FIA after someone gets hurt or (b) a cynical way to allow Alonso to race a Ferrari in his home GP.

    Consider this though. The Spanish fans only really care about Alonso and from the ones I know, there’s no way they’ll even watch if he doesn’t race…

  3. martinhaven

    I completely agree that this is over-reaction – but it sets such a dangerous precedent… banning teams for simple human error cannot be the answer, whatever the problem.
    The FIA is supposed to be in control of the sport. This kind of knee-jerk reaction does no good and can only make our sport and its governing body look stupid.
    Ridiculous decisions over driving incidents are one thing and subject to personal interpretation. This is profoundly stupid and serves no purpose whatsoever.
    How would a ban on Renault make the sport one iota safer? Clearly, it wouldn’t and if it isn’t helping the situation, it’s hindering it.
    That said, I cannot see an FIA Court of Appeal over-turning this decision, so await the reaction of Renault and FOTA with great interest and not a little dismay.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s